alternatives / unchained

deadhand vs unchained capital

why sovereign individuals are switching from unchained capital to deadhand protocol.

feature unchained capital deadhand
trust model custodial multi-sig ✔ non-custodial
cost asset management fees ✔ $400 lifetime
kyc required yes (identity risk) ✔ no (zero knowledge)
technology server-side ✔ client-side (shamir)
inheritance manual / legal ✔ dead man's switch
the bottom line: Unchained Capital charges you Asset management fees and forces you to accept custodial risk, kyc, us-only. deadhand is a one-time payment with zero kyc.

why unchained capital is a risk

unchained capital relies on a custodial multi-sig model. this means you are ultimately trusting a third party with either your keys, your identity, or your recovery process.

the deadhand advantage

zero knowledge

we don't know who you are. we don't want your ID. we can't access your funds even if we wanted to.

self-hosted, global, permissionless

unlike unchained capital, deadhand is built on pure math. no recurring fees, no permission asking.

shamir's secret sharing

we split your seed phrase into shards. mathematical security that doesn't rely on legal contracts.

protocol, not service

deadhand is designed to be a set-and-forget protocol. it works even if you disappear for 5 years.

secure your legacy.

stop renting your security from unchained capital. own it forever.

secure your vault

no credit card required to test.